ADRASTOS

Contact Info:

adrastos@bellsouth.net

Calendar

««Feb 2010»»
SMTWTFS
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28
Google

Adrastos Search

 

Mailing List

Please donate to the Morris family

Flickr - Latest Photos

TRIAL BALLOON

posted Saturday, 24 January 2009

The first section of Saturday's New Orleans Politics column/compendium by the Picayune's Bruce Eggler features a plea of poverty by an unnamed Councilmember or members. LINK. They, apparently, would like to have a raise from their current rate of $42,500 but would have to vote it for themselves. That would, of course, rev up the radio yakkers at WWL and have many citizens sharpening their pitchforks. Here's the kicker to Eggler's piece:

Without a significant raise, some of the incumbents may decide they can't afford to spend another four years at City Hall. On the other hand, they know that voting for a raise risks a public backlash that could doom their chances of winning.

Call it a lose-lose situation

Any thoughts as to which Councilmember floated this trial balloon? I'm thinking one of the Cynthias since James  Carter would have had take some initiative in speaking to Eggler instead of sticking his finger in the air to figure out which way the wind was blowing.

tags:          

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit

AddThis Social Bookmark Button




1. Civitch left...
Saturday, 24 January 2009 2:04 pm

I don't care which one of them floated it - it's high time we started paying our city councilpeople a reasonable salary. You shouldn't have to be independently well-off, or have to take a serious paycut in order to sit on the council, which, unlike the state legislature, really is a full-time job.


2. e left...
Saturday, 24 January 2009 2:54 pm :: http://wecouldbefamous.blogspot.com

I agree. I think it represents a form of ethics reform. $42k a year creates barriers for people that might otherwise look to run for public office. It ensures that only rich people run. I think that salary should be doubled, take home cars should be taken away, and City Councilors should have to be fulltime city employees because it is a full time job demanding full time attention.


3. Delta left...
Saturday, 24 January 2009 6:14 pm

"some of the incumbents may decide they can't afford to spend another four years at City Hall."

They say that like it's a bad thing.


4. bayoustjohndavid left...
Saturday, 24 January 2009 9:32 pm

I like your reasoning about it wasn't Carter, but I guess it would be suspicious if he were as high profile as other council members. I assume he's less financially established and has a younger family than the other council members, so he'd probably have more need to keep active in his law practice...unless he was making more than $42K as a councilman.

If you brought council salaries up to $80K that would cost $266K, about $290K after payroll taxes (I believe). I know <a href="http://www.nola. com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?/base/news-7/1170055887200240.xml&coll=1"& gt;where</a> you could get half of it. I've got ideas for the other half, but I was going to post about it.


5. adrastos left...
Saturday, 24 January 2009 11:43 pm

I'm inclined to think that they should be paid more BUT like all legislative bodies they need a different way to do it. As we saw last year, people get really pissed when they vote themselves a rause.