ADRASTOS

Calendar

««Nov 2009»»
SMTWTFS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930
Google

Adrastos Search

 

Mailing List

Please donate to the Morris family

Flickr - Latest Photos

KAISER ED STRIKES A NERVE

posted Thursday, 12 April 2007

Adam Nossiter's profile of Ed Blakely continues to reverberate around the blogosphere. Kaiser Ed is being praised, damned, explained, interpreted; you name it, he's being called it. Personally, I wish that der Kaiser would keep his lips zipped more tightly BUT the impulse among some to run Blakely out of town is short sighted. Rightly or wrongly, Blakely is seen on Capitol Hill as the person who broke the NOLA planning impasse. After hostility from the Hastert-Frist Congress, the Democratic leadership is on our side. And Blakely’s relationship with Speaker Pelosi is one of the reasons for our new found clout on the Hill. Another reason is Harry Reid’s desire to give Mary Landrieu everything she needs to hold her seat in 2008. If Kaiser Ed is thrown overboard, it will comfort our enemies and afflict our friends. There are times where one has to work with people one doesn’t care for and this is one of those times. (One is apparently NOT the loneliest number, in this post at least.) I find Kaiser Ed to be as imperious and arrogant as others do BUT I agree with Mr. Clio who called him in a comment at the mime blog: “The one-eyed man at a blind City Hall.”

Blakely has attempted to clarify and/or augment his comments in an interview with WDSU-TV: "Blakely apologized when he was asked to explain his "buffoon" comment. "I meant by that, look, this is a great city and people aren't going to take racism and sexism and so forth, anymore. We've got to step out of it. We've got to be a good city. We have to be a kind of city we want to live in. Everybody here has to be respected. They can't be dominating one another. They have to start working together."

"It's like a comedy act," he continued. "One side gets up, the other side goes down. I probably shouldn't have used that terminology but it seems ... foolishness."

Later, he added, "I regret using that terminology, I probably should have said 'foolish.'"

On referring to the city's racial environment as "a bit like the Shiites and Sunnis," Blakely said he was in an environment he must work around rather than try to change. "My job is to put out the truth," he told WDSU-TV. "As your grandma says, 'Sometimes people can't take the truth." I work around it and go straight up all the time."

He said he regrets ruffling feathers and "never want to put anyone offside ... but I am who I am."

Hey, he's Popeye. That means that Ashley Morris is Bluto; Arnie Fielkow is Wimpy and C Ray is Swee'pea. Pass the spinach, Kaiser Ed. 

Finally, here are some links to the NOLA Blogosphere’s Blakelypalooza. I agree with some of the posts and comments thereto and disagree with others but the response shows that Kaiser Ed has a hit a nerve and a raw one at that: Library Chronicles ; Ashley Morris-Mach 1 & Mach 2; Got Law; Wet Bank Guide; Traveling Mermaid ; G Bitch; Moldy City ; Nix Bits and Think NOLA . This list is by no means comprehensive but I hope that it's comprehensible.

UPDATE: Varg at the Chicory has chimed in with a thoughtful and well reasoned post. LINK

tags:        

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit

AddThis Social Bookmark Button




1. ashley left...
Thursday, 12 April 2007 5:52 am :: http://ashleymorris.typepad.com

Does that make Stacey Head Olive Oyl?


2. liprap left...
Thursday, 12 April 2007 6:59 am :: http://www.liprapslament-theline.blogspo

I like the Buffoonicles roundup you've got. We DO still need to wait and see on Monsieur Czar.

I'm just hoping it won't end up like the fella they hired as superintendent of schools ages ago...


3. liprap left...
Thursday, 12 April 2007 7:08 am :: http://www.liprapslament-theline.blogspo

Oh, and sorry for not commenting at your blog yesterday, Shecky. Mea culpa from a shonda fur da blogpocheh. 8-S


4. MAD left...
Thursday, 12 April 2007 7:52 am

So be it. Blakely keeps his job, and we must all continue to endure his endless mind-numbing blather because he is the holder of all essential "truth" and he has the balls to say it, unlike the slow and clueless locals. Okay. We critics will take one for the team, hope for the best and pray that this boorish, self-absorbed academic will eventually dispense some wisdom along with his insults.


5. bayoustjohndavid left...
Thursday, 12 April 2007 8:01 am :: http://bayoustjohndavid.blogspot.com/

I think the reaction is overblown; to some degree a reflection of how good it feels to be indignant. I really got a kick out out of Clancy DuBos loudly saying that this town was big enough for one opinionated loudmouth. Maybe he meant in public office.

However, I do resent the fact that, intentionally or not, Blakely set himself up to look like the outsider who came in and ruffled feathers and fell victim to the backwards provincialism of New Orleans if he ends up leaving because people refuse to let anybody be dictator.


6. Michael Homan left...
Thursday, 12 April 2007 8:39 am

A voice of moderation and reason. We'll keep him for Mary.


7. adrastos left...
Thursday, 12 April 2007 9:09 am

I'm officially bored with the Blakely controversy unless some new shit hits the fan. We just have to live with him and use his connections. Does anyone think Nancy Pelosi will pay any heed to Nagin?

Lip: Glad I was able to use guilt and manipulation to get a rise out of you. ;-)


8. Brian left...
Thursday, 12 April 2007 9:22 am :: http://gotla.ws

"Does anyone think Nancy Pelosi will pay any heed to Nagin?"

If he ain't internationally known as a hothead involved in conflicts grounded in religious tension, no joy.


9. jeffrey left...
Thursday, 12 April 2007 9:48 am :: http://librarychronicles.blogspot.com/

I think the "controversy" such as it is arises from the tension between our dissatisfaction with the way things are in this city (I think the GBitch post you've linked captures it well) and our concern that the rest of the world is unfairly condemning us for our problems.

Blakely's criticism can be a rallying point for those of us who want New Orleans to change for the better. I believe that includes everyone participating in the discussion. BUT I think it is a mistake to assume that the Ed Blakely is interested in accomplishing anything other than satisfying his own ego and furthering his reputation abroad whether anything he accomplishes here is beneficial to the city or not.

I still think David is closest to the truth. It may be Blakely's strategy to come away from this as the hero who just couldn't overcome the backwards morass of local yokelism. That way he doesn't have to really do anything other than pout for a year, leave us to continue deteriorating and move on to the next opportunity to be a leech somewhere else.

Is it really worth a supposed marginally improved relationship with Congresspersons to allow this to go unpunished?