ADRASTOS

Contact Info:

adrastos@bellsouth.net

Calendar

««Feb 2010»»
SMTWTFS
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28
Google

Adrastos Search

 

Mailing List

Please donate to the Morris family

Flickr - Latest Photos

JOHN MAGINNIS DRINKS THE KOOL AID

posted Thursday, 30 August 2007

I've always respected John Maginnis and used to consider him the dean of Louisiana political pundits. His books on the 1983 and 1991 Gubernatorial campaigns are classics and they were fairly balanced in tone and coverage. Maginnis was hard on everyone from Edwards to Treen to Roemer to Duke. But he seems to be so enthralled by Bobby Jindal and the possibility of "reform" that he's lost his mojo. He's sounding more like a publicist for Jindalizing the state than an analyst. It's a pity: he used to be one of the best.

Maginnis' column today was an "analysis" of some of the recent campaign ads on teevee. It's hard to argue his point that the anti-Jindal ads aimed at North Louisiana Protestants have backfired. They clearly have: those folks know for sure that Jindal has converted from Hinduism to right-wing Catholicism. But in the rest of the piece Maginnis becomes Bobby's poodle: arf, sniff, lick. I was particularly irked by this passage: "Voters were last shaking their heads over the ad in which Sen. Walter Boasso, D-Arabi, plays off against the cardboard figures of Jindal and President Bush and calls for withdrawing American troops from Iraq.

The common reaction was to ask what Boasso's venture into foreign policy has to do with governing Louisiana. Although polling showed that many Democrats and independents are unhappy with and tired of Bush, many still respect him, or at least the presidency, and don't care to see either mocked by a candidate for governor."

Unhappy? Tired? Bush is as unpopular here in the gret stet as he is in the rest of the country; especially among Democrats and Independents. I also know more than a few registered Republicans in NOLA who would love to give W either a piece of their mind or a swift kick in the ass. I thought Boasso's ad was an attempt to convince anti-Bush voters that his party switch was more than just an act of opportunism. The jury's out on whether it worked but criticizing Bush in August of 2007 does not qualify as an act of political recklessness or courage; everybody's doing it, doing it, doing it. It's more popular than the Hokey Pokey in the 1920's.

I must admit to grinding my teeth when Maginnis implied that criticizing a President is inappropriate for a candidate for governor. I wasn't aware that Mr. Boasso surrendered his free speech rights as a citizen by running for office. I hope that Jindal plans to limit his comments on national affairs too; as if he could ever STFU. He's already called for Senator Footsie to resign. Why not Vitty Cent?

I wonder what flavor of Kool Aid, Maginnis drank? Lime? Orange? Goofy grape? My money is on the following mantra: R is for Reform, Republican and Raspberry. And the raspberry is exactly what I give Maginnis' latest column. It makes me *almost* want Jindal to win and the Republicans to take control of the ledge. Hell, I think it's likely to happen anyway but I'd love to see how disappointed all the goo-goo reformer types will be once the the so-called reform Republicans actually take power. It will be 1994 all over again, y'all. I seem to recall that the Gingrichites campaigned in favor of radical reforms, term limits and promised to limit pork barrel spending. The exact opposite happened. They drank the Kool Aid of power and found the pork flavor to be most invigorating. The more things change, the more they remain the same.  

tags:      

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit

AddThis Social Bookmark Button




1. jeffrey left...
Thursday, 30 August 2007 10:55 pm :: http://librarychronicles.blogspot.com/

Man you are right on the money here. Maginnis is waaayy off base with this... and I've always liked him myself. It's fair game to criticize Jindal for his record of voting for Bush's stupid unpopular war 100 percent of the time. In addition to calling Jindal's own judgment into question, it also implies that a person not inclined to oppose Bush's immoral war policy cannot be trusted to oppose Bush's anti-recovery, anti-flood protection, anti-coastal restoration policy. It's not that hard to figure.


2. celcus left...
Friday, 31 August 2007 7:45 am

I had to say WTF to the column when I read it. I give Maginnis a pass this time, provided this isn't some new bent in his writing or he doesn't keep repeating it. I do have a criticism of the Basso ad in that the ad would have been far more powerful had he focused on Bush's shabby treatment of the state, rather than Iraq. Far better than Jindal-Bush-Iraq linkage is the Jindal-Bush-"Shut up and die already". And in state politics, that is probably the more powerful message to send to the voters.


3. adrastos left...
Friday, 31 August 2007 9:08 am

Maginnis has been treating Jindal like the messiah for quite some time. Hence the kool aid reference.

In part I agree about Boasso's message BUT the current one might resonate more in North and Central Louisiana where many people don't care for NOLA and think there's too much whining going on about the guvmint. Boasso needs to become better known there so they may have been his intent.


4. jeffrey left...
Friday, 31 August 2007 9:33 am :: http://librarychronicles.blogspot.com/

Plus.. Iraq is a sterling example of Jindal's inability to make independent moral decisions as evidenced through his voting record. If Jindal is running against the "old career politicians" or whatever.. we should expect his political career.. as it were.. to be characterized by independent "leadership" but instead he's just another party follower... even if following the party line means the kind of bloody waste that we have in Iraq.

Jindal is also subtly running on an anti-NOLA platform... at least, that's what I take his throwing around the words "corruption" and "incompetence" to mean. I'm not saying that there isn't actual corruption and incompetence in New Orleans. But using those words in empty political slogans is really a slick way of saying to North LA "We're gonna teach those.. buffoons.. in New Orleans a lesson." (You may substitute a more racially inflammatory term for "buffoon" there.. Lord know the target audience will)